Sunday, November 27, 2011

Synthesis: to put together

If you type into the Google search bar "synthesize", the second definition that comes up is: "Combine (a number of things) into a coherent whole." The TPACK model is a prime example of this definition: an ideal blend of pedagogy, technology, and content knowledge. The model, whose authors and contributors are numerous, aims to marry the information that educators have come to segregate. Instead of thinking of technology as one concept, TPACK combines technology with best teaching practices, or with content knowledge ... and sometimes both. The designers created a Venn Diagram to represent the three facets of TPACK in order to better show how the three concepts overlap each other.

Switching gears a moment ... In my first post, I promised some science, here goes. The whole concept of TPACK made me think of photosynthesis, a simply complex concept that can easily be broken down by its Latin roots: "photo" meaning light, and "synthesis" meaning to put together ... so we're putting something together via light reactions, which is (drum roll) plant food, aka glucose!!!

So how does this relate to TPACK? In an abstract way, if we break apart the key ingredients in photosynthesis and equate them with the parts of TPACK, it does work ... stay with me! The reactants, or the "ingredients", in photosynthesis are: sunlight, water, and carbon dioxide (so don't cut down trees or else we won't have something that can use up what we exhale!). Separate, these three reactants have importance and we can understand how they are important to the cycle of life, but they are not as effective. But together, these three reactants synthesize, or combine, to make oxygen (yay for usable air!) and glucose (aka plant food).

In the education world many of the key components to effective teaching are taught in separate, individual modules, and synthesis rarely happens. Without synthesis, we are left with three pieces of an incomplete puzzle ... Of all the professional fields, I am surprised that it has taken this long for a successful graphic model to be produced showing the important of linking pedagogy with technology -- because we know not all technology is good or useful -- as well as linking technology with content knowledge -- who knew that we could hook up a live camera to a microscope and project it onto the screen?

TPACK is a very sound model that I think many districts would benefit from studying, and creating professional development around. I never heard of it until taking this course, but I see the value in it ... especially a model that works to unite the various aspects of successful teaching instead of attempting to segregate it.

Sunday, November 13, 2011

An Administrator's Input

This week I struggled to find a specific topic to write on ... Out topic has been professional development, our struggles with it, and what is the most effective method of engaging in PD. As a class I think we all agree that a few hours of lecturing is not sufficient to significantly and positively impact educators. I decided to Google: "how to make professional development better". What I found was one man's quest to integrate technology into his teaching, how to create effective professional development (now that he's an administrator) and to share his thoughts with the education community.

From what I have gathered through his various biographical write-ups, and posts, this man, Matt Townsley, is a former math teacher and now a technology and curriculum instructor. I found various blogs, a district-wide twitter account, and blog that posts podcasts with various topics. This man is a leader in more ways than one. Not only does his title distinguish him as a leader, but also his actions. The details listed in his blog give me the impression that he is in tune with the needs, wants, and areas of improvements of his district. If I were a teacher, I would feel very in-the-loop.

What really caught my eye, though, was his latest post on his personal blog: as seen here. The powerpoint that he so effectively shows through Google Docs, outlines the integration of technology in the classroom. My favorite slide is #5, where he basically presents the difference between asking 'how can I use technology in my classroom' as opposed to 'how can I integrate technology to improve my lesson and enhance it?' It seems to be a question that not many administrators know the answer to, which leaves educators caught in a web of mediocre professional development workshops.

Matt had a very candid post about a year ago, presenting his views on professional development and I found his answers to one man's post very interesting. In his initial post, Matt addresses the issue of uninterested teachers and those that come with a chip on their shoulder. Many teachers come into professional development situations with preconceived notions, and are not willing to give something new a try. I mentioned in my discussion response that it was frustrating to go into a PD session and get lectured on elementary school topics. He writes:

"Let's say I spent all of my time visiting teachers before school, during their prep periods and after school on a regular basis. This means the teacher must be willing to give up his/her time to do this as well. This is the problem I see. In order to adequately bring teachers on board for many of the decisions they want to be a part of, they would need to participate in meetings on a weekly (and sometimes more often than that) basis. Sorry, Mrs. Jones...there goes your prep time; please take twice as much work home to do all in the name of increased input from you, the classroom teacher."
His argument is compelling and I am the first to admit that I value my prep time very much. It gives me a chance to decompress if necessary, set up for labs, clean up, organize any materials I collected, and to attend any necessary meetings. It is very interesting to see professional development from the other side of the desk, and to hear it not from someone who is close to retirement, and just going through the motions. This man seems to be full of ideas, is obviously in the know with technology, and seems to keep the whole district in the loop through his blogs and tweets (as long as they are willing to take the time and meet him half way).

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

On a completely different note that did not find a way to directly correlate with what I posted, I found a very interesting article on evaluating professional development in one's district in order to improve it. "Does It Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development"

Saturday, October 22, 2011

A harmonious online network

Richardson wrote, "The incredible growth of YouTube.com, Google Video, and other audio and video sites online is rattling the very foundations of television and radio, and it's no doubt going to b e very interesting to see how all of it plays out in the next few years" (2010, p.111). Throughout this past module, the class discussed various networking and social sites that may or may not be infiltrating our school systems ... While Many public schools have blocked flash, Facebook and YouTube, I was inspired by a very unlikely source this past week.


Eric Whitacre, a composer that I have been a fan of since my senior year of high school, created a musical movement, inspired by one girl's video. The original collaboration included 185 people, but after sometime, Whitacre went back and did version 2.0. This time he had 2,000 voices from all over the world, recorded at different times. They were synthesized into one hauntingly beautiful chorus that became the virtual choir singing "Sleep". (See Whitacre's Virtual Choir website)

Despite not being a choir teacher, I still find this global movement extremely inspiring. We have been discussing ways in which we can connect with people around the world, and expand our classrooms beyond the walls. As Richardson wrote, "...the Read/Write Web opens up all sorts of new possibilities for students to learn from each other or from authors or scientists and other professionals who can now work side by side in digital space even though they may be far away from one another physically" (2010, p.23).

I want to point out a very profound quote from Whitacre's brief intro: "For me singing together and making music together is a fundamental human experience and I love the idea that technology can bring people together from all over the world and participate in this transcended experience" (Whitacre, September 22, 2010, bold/italics added by me). I know I have been a naysayer and wary of technology making the world too plastic and inhuman. But this quote opened my eyes and really showed me what an awesomely great tool technology can be to harmonize humanity.

This is the full-length video of the 2011 Virtual Choir singing "Sleep". Even if you only watch the first 30 seconds, the image of the entire world being linked together is absolutely amazing.

Whitacre's video made me go back into my saved links, and I dug up another revolutionary way to get students connected and involved with others in the world:


Students actually have a chance to create an experiment with the hopes that it will be conducted in space!!! It's the ultimate science fair project! If not to be used as an in class assignment, what an amazing motivator this could be for gifted and super ambitious students. To foster this kind of creativity and excitement is what we live and work for ...

While there are many negative aspects to the web, there are also those people out there that are making us feel more and more connected each day, one student at a time.

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Picasso or Picasa?

My parents are artists, and a few weekends ago we were discussing Nooks, Kindles, and the possible disappearance of books. My mother who is an avid reader and lover of all things book-like, has a legitimate fear that one day all books will be electronic. I believe there are some that are resistant to the change in technology -- perhaps the Baby Boomers and +/- 10 years of that generation. I also believe there are those that fear a technology take over that will eliminate anything and everything tangible and real. I think I fall somewhere in the latter category, right alongside my mom.

As far as Baby Boomers go, my mom is no stranger to technology. As a graphic designer she had to take community college courses in order to learn Quark, Adobe Photoshop, Publisher, and other publishing software mostly for the Mac. Her days of sketching everything on the light table were done, and her profession did a 180ยบ. Picasso turned into Picasa overnight, and the fine arts part of Bachelor of Fine arts seemed to disappear for my mom in the blink of an eye.

Even as I take this course, I find myself battling the technology movement because as much as I love my Nook, I don't want books to disappear. I don't want art to become digitally drawn and painted on a tablet. I don't want my students to not know how to write in cursive -- did you know they're eliminating that from curriculum?? For as much as a technology helps us move forward and link with people all around the world, I also feel that it takes away from reality. We are constantly separated by a screen.

With that being said, it's impossible to deny the opportunities technology has afforded our students: blogs that connect them to real authors (Richardson's class communicating with Sue Monk Kidd), to real people (Skype, Cisco), to microscopic worlds (cameras that connect to microscopes and project images), and to access curriculum through wikis 24/7. I would not trade my laptop and the tools it gives me for anything, and to be able to communicate with relatives across the country and world is amazing. When I think of Digital Natives vs. Immigrants, I have placed myself into the Immigrants category.

Technology is a great tool; we just can't forget that it is a smaller -- yet very integral -- part of a larger world.

(Another post will follow, relating to our curriculum/readings.)

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

First post: Jukes vs. Richardson


Intro to Digital Tools: Rutgers University. Blog by: Johanna Cella.




Hi there, welcome to my blog, created for Prof. Pope's Intro to Digital Tools course. I am excited to get a start on this assingment, mostly because it's bringing back my html skills and allowing me to be creative and fun with graphics, as well as coding. I'm hoping to set up some pretty awesome posts in the coming weeks, using the html coding option.

I'll share as much html as I can, but most of it is coming from my head, as well as some help from this awesome site right here: Quackit.com. It has a ton of options for you to browse through, and it's what's allowing me to set up my scrolling marquee up at the top!

For my first post, I decided to stick with the topics in Module 2, specifically the Jukes and Richardson videos since I chose a different prompt in the discussion thread. I wanted to compare, and idenifty similarities as well as differences. I've also included a poll at the bottom, if you would not mind filling it out. Feedback, comments, and expansions on your opinions are always welcome! (I have no idea why there is such a gap between the videos and the table I made ... I can't figure it out!)

vs.



















Ian JukesWill Richardson
● Vocab: "DSL", "DFL", "digital natives", "neuroplasticity"● Vocab: "collabortaive space", "synchronous", "literacy"
● Brain structure is physically different than 50 years ago● Future is unpredictable
● Children are fluent in digital language● Most work will be collaborative and done synchronously with people in other countries
● 50% of brain wiring is in place at birth; the other 50% comes later● Paperless future
● Brains are consistently changing: depends on input & duration of the input● NCLB = hindering technology progression (too focused on test results)
● Neuroplasticity: the idea that the brain is malleable and changing● Need leadership from the top down; lead schools into the 21C. learning style
● Supports author, Johnson, that states today's kids are thinking more adult-like due to mature themes in video games● "Thinnly Walled Classrooms": nonlinear and messy
● We need to nurture both sides of the brain; not just the left● Physical space should not be an issue; a multimedia room is where the action should be
● Similarities: Both push for educators to shift their mode of thinking; recognize that the world is not what it used to be; the change is happening quickly and we need to adapt with it because children are at a disadvantage if we do not● Differences: Jukes focused more on research on the brain, and how to adapt to a generation with brains that are wired differently; Richardson focused on how to adapt to a changing society and methods of communication, as well as school's space and how to integrate physical and digital space


Do you think today's children are being exposed to too much information too soon with the help of fast-paced technology?
  
pollcode.com free polls